Why drawdowns matter

Drawdowns are public enemy #1 for retirement portfolios.

What are drawdowns? It’s the amount an account falls from it’s previous high point.

Year 1 = 20% investment loss.
Year 2 =25% investment loss.

Example 1: Drawdowns are magnified when investment losses are coupled with portfolio withdrawals.

Year 1 and 2 withdrawal is 5% (i.e. $5 then $3.60).
Year 1 = 20% investment loss.
Year 2 =25% investment loss

Example 2: Drawdowns can occur when there are investment gains that are less than portfolio withdrawals.

Year 1 and 2 withdrawal is 5% (i.e. $5 then $4.94).
Year 1 = 4% investment gain.
Year 2 =4% investment gain

Drawdowns caused by investment losses without withdrawals slows the growth of your portfolio.

Drawdowns caused by investment losses and withdrawals could lead to reduced cash flow or running out of money.

When you experience large drawdowns matters.

Early Draw Downs

Sequence of returns risk is the risk of receiving bad investment returns early in retirement.

Bad investment returns could be:

  • Large portfolio losses early in retirement (see example 2 above)
  • Portfolio returns that don’t support withdrawals (see example 3 above)

Here is a simple example:

  • The Red and Blue lines both:
    • Start with a $1,000,000 balance
    • Withdraw $45,000 in year one then increased by 2.5% each year after
    • Grow by 7.5% in year 3 through 28
  • The Blue line starts with a 10% loss in years 1 and 2. In years 29 and 30, it grows by 10%.
  • The Red line starts with a 10% gain in years 1 and 2. In years 29 and 30, it grows by 10%.

As you can see the results are dramatically different. Both portfolios averaged 6.50% returns. One portfolio ended with more than it started. The other went negative before year 29.

The example above use simple, hypothetical returns to set the framework. Unfortunately, sequence of returns risk isn’t just a cute academic exercise.

A historical example illustrating sequence of returns

Rita and Chase each have $1 Million. They don’t need to spend it since they plan on living on their pension and Social Security income.

Rita has never liked the ups and downs of the market. Even though she’s not planning on spending the money she still chooses to use a less volatile strategy.

Rita is smart and has researched different investment strategies. She understands the importance knowledge plays in committing to an investment strategy.

She decides that a strategy that combines stocks and bonds is best for her. She’s willing to sacrifice the growth of her portfolio since she knows the combination will reduce the downside.

Chase has built his wealth using his favorite stock fund and has an iron stomach to stick through down markets.

He chooses to invest his money just like he did throughout his career.

Chase’s bet pays off. His average return is 1.88% more than Rita’s.

Rita receives 12.07% while Chase receives 13.95%. This bet earned him over $4 million more than Rita.

For illustrative and educational purposes only. This chart is being presented to show the results of two hypothetical portfolios from January 1973 to December 1997. It does not represent the performance of any Curious and Calculated portfolio or investment strategy. Returns assume the reinvestment of all distributions and do not reflect trading costs, transaction fees, commissions, or actual taxes due on investment returns. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Nothing herein should be interpreted as personalized investment advice.
 
US Stock Market is represented by AQR US MKT Factor Returns 1972-1992 (AQR Data Sets) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund (VTSMX) 1993+. US Intermediate Treasuries are represented by FRED Interest Rate Data (5-year maturity) 1972-1991 and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury Fund (VFITX) 1992+.

Chase’s annual return was also higher than Rita’s return, 16 out of 25 years return. He won nearly two out of every three years. Congrats Chase!

The results here align with the basis of classical portfolio management. Accepting more risk is required to receive maximize long-term wealth.

What would happen if they took withdrawals?

Now let’s assume Rita and Chase need to withdraw from their portfolio. Rita will keep her portfolio that averaged 12.07%. Chase will keep his portfolio that averaged 13.95%.

Who is going to win?

For illustrative and educational purposes only. This chart is being presented to show the results of distributions on two hypothetical portfolios from January 1973 to December 1997. It does not represent the performance of any Curious and Calculated portfolio or investment strategy. Returns assume the reinvestment of all distributions and do not reflect trading costs, transaction fees, commissions, or actual taxes due on investment returns. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Nothing herein should be interpreted as personalized investment advice.
 
US Stock Market is represented by AQR US MKT Factor Returns 1972-1992 (AQR Data Sets) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund (VTSMX) 1993+. US Intermediate Treasuries are represented by FRED Interest Rate Data (5-year maturity) 1972-1991 and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury Fund (VFITX) 1992+. Distributions taken at the end of the period and adjusted by inflation. Inflation is represented by Bureau of Labor and Statistics Consumer Price Index (CPI-U)

When you take distributions from a portfolio, the math completely changes.

Rita and Chase still experience the same average return as before. However, Chase experiences larger drawdowns early in the sequence.

Because large drawdowns happened early in retirement, Chase’s account drops and never recovers enough to outpace Rita.

After taking distributions, Rita beat Chase by nearly $500,000!

Chase averaged 1.88% more than Rita over that time frame. He also had a better return than her 2 out of every 3 years. Wow! If you were given a crystal ball, would you be able to pass up the portfolio that would yield 1.88% more and outperform over 60% of the time?

•The information set forth in this document has been obtained or derived from sources believed by NKB, LLC (“The Author”) to be reliable. However, The Author does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the information’s accuracy or completeness, nor do The Author recommend that the information serve as the basis of any investment decision.

•PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE AND INVESTMENTS IN EQUITY SECURITIES DO PRESENT RISK OF LOSS.

•The strategies discussed in this presentation are not appropriate for all investors. The results shown in this presentation are hypothetical and do not represent returns that an investor actually attained.

•No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve results similar to those shown.

•The content of this presentation is provided for informational purposes only, and nothing herein should be interpreted as personalized investment advice. Under no circumstances does this information represent an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation regarding any securities transaction.

•None of the content in this presentation is guaranteed to be correct, and anything shown here should be subject to independent verification.

•You, and you alone, are solely responsible for any investment decisions that you make. The strategies discussed in this presentation are for educational purposes and are provided with the benefit of hindsight and may not perform in the future as they have historically. They do not reflect actual trading by the Author or any of the Author’s clients

•There can be no assurance that any investment strategy or style will achieve any level of performance, and investment results may vary substantially from year to year or even from month to month. An investor could lose all or substantially all of his or her investment. Both the use of a single adviser and the focus on a single investment strategy could result in the lack of diversification and consequently, higher risk. The information herein is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for accounting, legal or tax advice or investment recommendations. Any investment strategy and themes discussed herein may be unsuitable for investors depending on their specific investment objectives and financial situation. You should consult your investment adviser, tax, legal, accounting or other advisors about the matters discussed herein. These materials represent an assessment of the market environment at specific points in time and are intended neither to be a guarantee of future events nor as a primary basis for investment decisions.

•Investors should understand that while performance results may show a general rising trend at times, there is no assurance that any such trends will continue. If such trends are broken, then investors may experience real losses. The information included in this presentation reflects the different assumptions, views and analytical methods of The Author as of the date of this document. The views expressed reflect the current views as of the date hereof and The Author should not be expected to advise you of any changes in the views expressed herein.

•This commentary has been provided solely for informational purposes and does not constitute a current or past recommendation or an offer or solicitation of an offer, or any advice or recommendation, to purchase any securities or other financial instruments, and may not be construed as such. This commentary should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product.

•This document does not reflect the actual performance results of any investment strategy or index currently run NKB LLC or its affiliates.

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *